Turner v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDNER, Justice.
I.Introduction
Appellant Marcus Turner appeals from his conviction for capital murder. In five points, he contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea bargaining process and that the trial court erred by admitting unauthenticated testimony regarding controlled substances, by failing to suppress his written statement, by denying his requested jury instruction concerning the voluntariness of his written statement, and by failing to dismiss the indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct. Because we conclude that Appellant’s counsel rendered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Aldrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Frye v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Jiminez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.