United States v. Gill
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YOUNG, Judge.
A military judge convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of indecent assault, two specifications of communicating indecent language, and one specification of indecent exposure, all in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1994). The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 2 years and 6 months, and reduction to E-1. Appellant assigns nine errors. We find no error and affirm.
I. Facts
Appellant started working in the Hematology/Oncology ward at Wilford Hall Medical Center in February 1992.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. OatneyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
- United States v. McDanielUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. MeakinUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017