Legal Opinion

United States v. Gill

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 13, 1994No. ACM 30279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

YOUNG, Judge.

A military judge convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of indecent assault, two specifications of communicating indecent language, and one specification of indecent exposure, all in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1994). The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 2 years and 6 months, and reduction to E-1. Appellant assigns nine errors. We find no error and affirm.

I. Facts

Appellant started working in the Hematology/Oncology ward at Wilford Hall Medical Center in February 1992.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. OatneyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. McDanielUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  4. United States v. MeakinUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API