Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Scott Douglas Nordstrom

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2012No. CR-09-0266-APPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This automatic appeal arises from Scott Douglas Nordstrom’s 2009 death sentences for his 1996 murders of Thomas Hardman and Carol Lynn Noel. We have jurisdiction under Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 13-4031 (2011).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On May 30, 1996, Scott Nordstrom and Robert Jones shot and killed Thomas Hard-man and Clarence O’Dell while robbing the Moon Smoke Shop in Tucson. State v. Nord-strom (Nordstrom I), 200 Ariz. 229, 236-37 ¶¶ 1-4, 25 P.3d 717, 724-25 (2001). Two weeks later, Nordstrom and Jones…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Mark GoudeauArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Scott Nordstrom v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Arizona v. Andre Michael LeteveArizona Supreme Court · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API