Wall v. Trogdon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.
It is seen that plaintiffs undertake to ground their -alleged cause of action on (1) trespass .and (2) -actionable negligence. Even ,so, when the evidence shown in the record of ease on appeal is taken in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and giving to them the benefit of every reasonable inference therefrom, the case in both aspects is left in a -state of uncertainty and rests upon possibility.
First, in -respect to trespass, it is noted that the General Assembly of 1929 passed an -act, Chapter 190, entitled “An Act Concerning Aeronautics and the Regulation of -Aircraft, Pilots and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Jenkins v. STARRETT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Ingold v. Carolina Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Majebe v. North Carolina Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Reason v. Singer Sewing MacHine CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.