Legal Opinion

Davis Wright & Jones v. National Union Fire Insurance

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 7, 1989No. C88-780DRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DAVIS WRIGHT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the court on a motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Davis Wright & Jones (“Davis Wright”). Having reviewed the motion together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, 1 and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:

I. BACKGROUND

In March of 1985, defendant National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”) filed suit against Seafirst Corporation and its subsidiary, Seattle-First National Bank (collectively “Seafirst”) as well as certain…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arlyn W. Nordhorn v. Ladish Company, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation Armco, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Larry Harmon v. Ben GordonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Ford v. New Mexico Department of Public SafetyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, and Davis, Wright & Jones, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, and Davis, Wright & Jones Marsh & McLennan Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent-Intervenor, and Seafirst Corporation, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. Seafirst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API