Legal Opinion
National Union Fire Insurance v. Seafirst Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 12, 1989No. Nos. 88-3970, 88-4342 and 88-7248PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. and Seafirst Corporation reached a comprehensive settlement after judgment was entered against National Union in Part I, of a planned two part trial. As part of the settlement Seafirst supported National Union's motion to vacate the judgment that was entered against National Union in Part I of the trial. The district court denied the motion. National Union seeks a writ of mandamus or alternatively appeals. We deny the writ, take the case on appeal, and affirm the district court.
FACTS
National Union issued $55…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., and Ringsby-Pacific, Ltd. v. Western Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Seafirst Corporation, and Davis, Wright & Jones, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, and Davis, Wright & Jones Marsh & McLennan Arthur Andersen & Co., Respondent-Intervenor, and Seafirst Corporation, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Anton Toutov v. Curative Labs Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Courtney Motley v. M. Malta, C. MirandaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Feagins v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.