Doan v. Seagate Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee Jack L. Doan alleges that his employment with Defendant-Appellant Seagate Technology, Inc. was terminated because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, and Oklahoma public policy. 1 The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff. Seagate filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, which was denied by the district court. This appeal followed.
I. Background
Seagate designs, manufactures and markets hard disk drives for computer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Alvin Rea, Gordon Keepers, Robert Reynolds, Barbara Weightman, and Barbara Van Den Arend v. Martin Marietta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Janet M. Merillat v. Metal Spinners, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Ford v. Jackson National LifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.