Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
■ Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. On December 1, 1891, appellees filed their bill of complaint against appellants, alleging,- among other matters not in controversy on this appeal, the issuance to one Reynolds of letters patent of the United States No. 317,202, No. 328,614, and No. 456,122, to one Baldwin of letters patent No. 248,908 and No. 456,107, and to one Moore of letters patent No. 309,865; that by assignment…
Read the full summary
■ Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. On December 1, 1891, appellees filed their bill of complaint against appellants, alleging,- among other matters not in controversy on this appeal, the issuance to one Reynolds of letters patent of the United States No. 317,202, No. 328,614, and No. 456,122, to one Baldwin of letters patent No. 248,908 and No. 456,107, and to one Moore of letters patent No. 309,865; that by assignment appellees had become owner of all the rights originally vested by force of said patents in said patentees; that…
1Opinion of the CourtShowalter, Circuit Judge
(after tbe foregoing recital): Counsel, in their printed argument, hare discussed the jurisdiction or province of this court on this appeal. What may be said touching the function of this court, the scope of the review which may be had *771here, the form and effect of an adjudication here, either of reversal or affirmance, as bearing on the status of the cause in the circuit court, conies logically first in any pronouncement to be made on this record. In England, as I understand, the right of appeal in chancery cases was developed by the courts, — possibly out of analogies from the civil law. In…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Eastern Dynamite Co. v. Keystone Powder Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1908
- Chicago Wooden Ware Co. v. Miller Ladder Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. BuckDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1932
- Snead v. SchebleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.