Legal Opinion

Wiik v. Russell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1928No. 26,573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendant Edward R. Sager appeals from an order denying his motion to have the action as to him dismissed. He is the holder of a mortgage upon the premises affected, made and recorded prior to the filing of plaintiff’s lien, but which is claimed to have been given after the commencement of the building operations on the premises, and hence to be subsequent and subject to the lien.

The complaint in the action was filed August 21, 1926, and summons issued and delivered to the sheriff for service. On August 21 the sheriff made return on the summons…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacob v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Grigsby v. WopschallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gilmore v. LampmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Canty v. BockenstedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Cone v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Schuett v. PowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API