Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Lampman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1902No. Nos. 13,047-(170)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, McGee, J., setting aside the service of summons upon defendant Adelaide B. Lampman.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, service by publication was attempted to be made as to the respondent Adelaide B. Lamp-man, and the following affidavit was executed on June 27, and filed on July 18, 1901:
*494“State of Minnesota, )
(ss.
County of Hennepin. )
“A. Gf. Morey, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is the attorney for the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action; that the above action was brought for the purpose of foreclosing a mechanic’s lien, and that Adelaide B. Lampman, one of the defendants, has property in this city, and is the owner of property described in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barber v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Feikert v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Corson v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Easton v. ChildsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Brown v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Atwood v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Hopman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Felsinger v. QuinnWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Roberts v. Enderlin Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.