Legal Opinion

Claypool v. Malta Standard Garage

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1934No. 7,197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an action in conversion to recover the reasonable value of 409 bushels and 40 pounds of wheat, alleged to have been converted by defendant, respondent here, on or about the seventh day of September, 1932. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court granted an order directing judgment of nonsuit, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

From the evidence introduced by plaintiff, appellant here, it appears that one George Jones had leased land to Emmett Claypool on a crop-division basis. Jones was to have two-thirds and Claypool one-third of the crops raised. The wheat in controversy was a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lee v. Stockmen's National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Dover Lumber Co. v. WhitcombMontana Supreme Court · 1917

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. HortonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stranahan v. Independent Natural Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Costello v. ShieldsMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pankovich v. Little Horn State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Augestad's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API