Legal Opinion
Boyd v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 2006No. 27636PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Appellant Joseph Leo Boyd, Jr. (“Mov-ant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his second amended Rule 24.035 motion to vacate, set aside or correct judgment and sentence. 1 Movant alleges five points of motion court error. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.
The record reveals Movant was charged by Information on June 20, 2002, with one count of the Class D felony of unlawful use of a weapon, a violation of section 571.030.1(4); one count of the Class C felony of assault in the second degree, a violation of section 565.060;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bequette v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Castor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- DARREN S. SMITH II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Stuart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.