Legal Opinion
Bequette v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 2005No. ED 84289PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, Judge.
Amil Bequette (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.
Movant was charged with three counts of criminal non-support. After the State agreed to various conditions, including an agreement to dismiss two of the three counts, Movant pled guilty to one count of criminal non-support. The trial court sentenced Movant to three years’ imprisonment.
Movant filed his pro se motion for post-conviction relief after sentencing. Mov-ant’s appointed attorney filed an amended…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Rice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Corey A. Wiggins, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Boyd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- May v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.