DARREN S. SMITH II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, J.
Darren Smith (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in overruling his motion because plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney when he advised Movant to delay acceptance of a plea offer without advising Mov-ant that the plea offer could be withdrawn at any time. We do not reach the issue of whether plea counsel failed to advise Mov-ant as alleged because even if so, the motion court’s finding that Movant was not prejudiced by that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ivan Mitchell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- ANNETTE CROSS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- DARREN J. WINANS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Murphy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Borneman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.