Legal Opinion
Hill v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 2010No. SD 29559PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
In his sole point relied on, Craig Anthony Hill (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an evidentiary hearing of his post conviction motion filed pursuant to Rule 24.035, premised on his assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel which caused him to plead guilty to the crime of passing a bad check when, as he maintains, he had a viable defense to the crime. 1 We affirm the denial of Movant’s postconviction motion.
The record reveals Movant was charged by Felony Information on November 15, 2005, with one count of the Class D felony of passing bad…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Isla Ballard v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Yarberry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gleason v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.