Legal Opinion
Latz v. Latz A/K/A Schafer
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 11, 1971No. 275, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
In Schneider v. Schneider, 160 Md. 18, Ludwig Schneider and James Schneider appealed from a judgment against them by their mother for personal injuries sustained by her while riding in an automobile owned by Ludwig and driven by James. There was no question of the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding of negligence on the part of James in driving the automobile. The Court found that neither Ludwig nor James ■could in law be held answerable to their mother for injuries caused by the negligence of James. Why James ■could not be so held is directly relevant to the case before…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Shell Oil Co. v. RyckmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.