Legal Opinion

David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc. v. Isaacs

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 1988No. C1-88-1059, C8-88-1060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Gerald Isaacs appealed from a temporary injunction requiring him to endorse stock certificates, but failed to seek any stay pending resolution of his appeal. Respondent David N. Volkmann Construction moved the trial court for enforcement of the injunction, but the trial court ruled it lacked jurisdiction, due to the pending appeal. Respondent now moves this court to require Isaacs to post a supersedeas bond to protect David N. Volkmann Construction pending appeal.

DECISION

An appeal does not automatically stay enforcement of an injunction. The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Kane v. LockeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Clark v. Robnan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. In Re Estate of GoyetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Smith v. Condux International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API