Legal Opinion
Miller v. United Welfare Fund
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 1, 1994No. 93 CV 2057 (JRB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARTELS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Goldie Miller brings this action on behalf of her deceased sister, Sarah Potok, against defendant United Welfare Fund to recover medical benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act [“ERISA”], 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). The parties have each moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [“Rule”] 56. For reasons more fully explained herein, the cross-motions for summary judgment are denied.
FACTS
The United Welfare Fund [“the Fund”] is an “employee welfare benefit plan” as defined by ERISA.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Judith P. Masella v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Crocco v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Nagele v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Mirto v. Amalgamated Retail Insurance FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.