Legal Opinion
Crocco v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 5, 1997No. 5:91-cv-00779PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff in this civil action, Kimberly Crocco, was an employee of defendant Xerox Corp., a maker of office equipment. Defendant Patricia Nazemetz is the administrator and fiduciary of Xerox’s employee benefits plan and a management-level employee of the company. Defendant American Psych-management (APM) is a corporation that reviews the mental health treatment of benefit plan participants to determine eligibility for reimbursement. Crocco has brought this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23945s Kimberly J. Crocco v. Xerox Corporation and Patricia M. Nazemetz, and American Psychmanagement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Blue Cross of California v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Brown v. Board of Trustees of the Building Service 32B-J Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Elsroth v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.