Legal Opinion

United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. Bates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2005No. 03-10548, 03-10604PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants David Larry Smith (“Smith”) and Herbert Arthur Bates (“Bates”) appeal their convictions on multiple counts of tax fraud, mail and wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy, as well as their sentences. Defendants challenge: (1) arraignment by a magistrate judge, (2) multiplicity of the indictment resulting in a multiplicitous sentence on the three conspiracy counts, (3) an indictment passed on by grand jurors not questioned about their feeling towards the IRS, (4) denial of a suppression motion based on alleged defects in the arrest and search…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean Michael GrierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. StatenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. MixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API