Legal Opinion

State v. Massey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2008No. 49A02-0712-CR-1136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Indiana Code section 9-19-10-2 (the seatbelt statute) provides, in relevant part, that each occupant of a motor vehicle equipped with a safety belt “shall have a safety belt properly fastened about the occupant’s body at all times when the vehicle is in forward motion.” Is an occupant who has the lap belt fastened but who is not wearing the shoulder belt across his shoulder violating the statute? The purpose of the seatbelt statute and the language chosen by the legislature lead us to conclude that an occupant must have the lap belt fastened and wear the shoulder…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. EstepIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gauvin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Tariq-Madyun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Pruitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Houston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State of Indiana v. Shelby L. Pieper (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API