Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Reagan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1999No. 32S00-9812-CV-767PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

The plaintiffs contend that the Indiana Seatbelt Enforcement Act authorizes the police to stop motorists in violation of their state constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. We agree that the police may not enforce the seat belt law in violation of these constitutional rights. In this opinion, we hold that an Indiana police officer may not stop a motorist to enforce the seat belt law unless the officer observes circumstances that would cause an ordinary person to agree that the driver or passenger is not wearing a seat belt. However, because the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API