Legal Opinion
State v. Estep
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 10, 2001No. 49A05-0009-CR-371PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court's grant of Samuel Eistep's Motion to Suppress evi dence seized during Estep's arrest in his residence. The State makes two allegations of error: first, that the trial court's ruling on Estep's Motion to Suppress was contrary to law, and second, that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard when reviewing the issuance of the search warrant.
We affirm. 1
FACTUAL SUMMARY
On March 10, 1999, Sheriff's deputies received a Crime Stopper tip that Samuel Estep was residing at 241 North Reisner Avenue in Indianapolis. Deputies had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FarberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GlassIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. StamperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.