Deas v. Lido Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiff filed an action in Mendocino County to have a certain default judgment against him declared null and void and to recover the proceeds of the sale of a pickup truck which was sold under said judgment. Defendant corporation demurred and filed a notice of motion for change of venue to Los Angeles County where its principal place of business was. This appeal is from the order denying said motion.
The complaint alleges that on June 6, 1952, the appellant filed a claim and delivery action, No. 17857, against respondent in Mendocino County to obtain delivery of three electric motors; that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bullard v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mosby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Enter v. CrutcherAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
- Enter v. CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Steiner v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972