McPhail v. Nunes
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NICOL, P. J., pro tem.
This is an action brought by plaintiff to quiet title to a certain tract of land in Kings County, California, particularly described as the northeast quarter of section 3, township 24 south, range 18 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, and to have set aside and declared null and void a certain judgment entered in the superior court in Kings County on the tenth day of June, 1909, in the case of Nunes v. Copper et al. The complaint was filed June 19, 1915.
Defendants answered and in the second amended answer denied that plaintiff was the - owner of the lands in question,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Schroder v. Aden Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Sears v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Klumpke v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Scott v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Gramson v. GeniellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. WardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kuenzel v. GrettenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.