Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Carefree Carolina Communities, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 8929SC210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal in this action in which plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries arising out of a fall on defendant’s premises is whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for defendant. Summary judgment should be granted only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. McCurry v. Wilson, 90 N.C. App. 642, 643, 369 S.E.2d 389, 391 (1988). The moving party may meet this burden by showing that an essential element of the non-moving party’s claim or defense is nonexistent. Moore v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Mazzacco v. PurcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Coston v. Skyland Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API