Legal Opinion
Hellenbrand-Sztaba v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 25, 1996No. 91-572 VPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
This action was brought under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act”). 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. Petitioners appeal from the ruling of the Special Master denying compensation for the death of their son, Damien.
After a full evidentiary hearing, the Special Master ruled that petitioners failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that their son’s death was caused by the table injury anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) or that his death was in any way caused by his Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus immunization. Petitioners allege that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alisa Bradley and Ronald Bradley, Parents and Next Friends of Rachel Bradley v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Mary Ann Jay and Michael H. Jay, as Legal Representatives of Matthew Michael Jay, Deceased v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Summar v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Hossack v. Secretary of Department of HealthUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Mills v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServiceUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe/70 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Guillory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Carraggio v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Pulsipher v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025