Legal Opinion

Summar v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 31, 1991No. 90-415VPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This vaccine case is before the Court on a motion for review, filed by petitioners August 2, 1991, challenging the Special Master’s decision denying their claim for compensation. Summar v. Secretary of the Dep’t of Health and Human Services, No. 90-415V, slip op., 1991 WL 133607 (Cl.Ct. July 3, 1991) (decision of Special Master).

Petitioners, Sue Summar and Lee Sum-mar, filed a petition on behalf of their son, Kevin, for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300aa-l et seq. (West Supp.1991) (Vaccine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gary G. Bunting, as Father and Next Friend of Bradley Bunting, a Minor v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. McClendon v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. Ultimo v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Terran v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Mills v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServiceUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Aea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API