Novy v. Woolsey Energy Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Arnold-Burger, J.:
Michael and Janet Novy (the Novys) own land subject to an oil and gas lease held by Woolsey Energy Corporation (Woolsey). Woolsey has refused to drill for either oil or gas on their land for over 30 years because Woolsey has determined, based on its own engineering study, that any well would not produce oil or gas in commercial quantities and the cost would significantly exceed any benefit. The Novys argue that Woolsey has breached its implied duty to develop the íand and, accordingly, the lease as to the right to drill for oil should be terminated. The district court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Thoroughbred Associates, L.L.C. v. Kansas City Royalty Co., L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Temple v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.