Legal Opinion

Pretz v. Lamont

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 17, 1981No. 51,607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, J.:

Plaintiif brought this action seeking recovery for personal injuries caused by an automobile accident. In a previous action arising out of the same collision, plaintiff had recovered her property damage from the defendant herein. The trial court dismissed the personal injury action on the ground the plaintiff had improperly split her cause of action and the present action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiff appeals from this determination.

On July 18, 1977, plaintiff Sibyl L. Pretz was operating a motor vehicle which collided with a motor vehicle operated by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adamson v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Lee v. GuettlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Jayhawk Equipment Co. v. MentzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Key v. CleggCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  5. Dinesen v. TowleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carter v. City of EmporiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Landry v. LuscherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Klaassen v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  4. Hall v. DoeringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  5. Wright v. Brotherhood Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API