Legal Opinion

Dinesen v. Towle

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 13, 1979No. 50,000PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

The trial court in this case dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action on the basis that this action is barred by the statute of limitations, K.S.A. 60-513. We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The cause of action arose out of an automobile collision that occurred on February 3, 1975. The plaintiff, Catherine M. Dinesen, was injured when she struck the left side of her head against the steering wheel of her car, and she received medical attention following the accident. The point of controversy of this case arises because the plaintiff’s medical expenses did not exceed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Weil & Associates v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Johnston v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bond v. GallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Donnelly v. DeBourkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. West v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Cansler v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Del Rio Ex Rel. Del Rio v. CrakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API