Legal Opinion

Jayhawk Equipment Co. v. Mentzer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1963No. 43,006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action in the nature of a judgment creditors bill to set aside a conveyance, or in the alternative, to impress an equitable lien upon the real estate. Upon stipulations of the parties at a pretrial conference the trial judge held the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

The determinative question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

An understanding of the issues presented by the pleadings may be simplified by stating the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Kearny County Bank v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Fletcher v. KelloggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Ondrasek v. OndrasekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Gray v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Maxine G. EverettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Goetz v. Board of Trustees, Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Patrons State Bank & Trust Co. v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Crutsinger v. HessDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API