Legal Opinion

Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

N. C. Code, 1935 (Micbie), sec. 469, is as follows: “In all other cases the action must be tried in the county in which the plaintiffs or the defendants, or any of them, reside at its commencement; or, if none of the defendants reside in the State, then in the county in which the plaintiffs, or any of them, reside; and if none of the parties reside in the State, then the action may be tried in any county which the plaintiff designates in his summons and complaint, subject to the power of the court to change the place of trial, in the case provided by statute.”

Section 470: “If the county…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barney v. OelrichsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Wright v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Belding v. ArcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Town of Roanoke Rapids v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Juarez-Martinez v. DeansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc. v. TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Piner v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Fowler v. Dep't of RevenueNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API