Legal Opinion

Barney v. Oelrichs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1891No. 177PublishedCited by 40 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

This was an action brought against Hiram Barney to recover back money alleged to have been illegally exacted by him when collector of the port of New York, as duty on certain charges and commissions, and as fees for services rendered in the custom-house in connection with merchandise imported, and was commenced in the Superior Court of New York City by service of summons, dated March 27, 1868, on the defendant, April 16, 1868, and subsequently removed into the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

The declaration consisted of the common counts, and, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frost & Dickinson v. BrisbinNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. In re ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. In re WrigleyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  4. Penfield v. Chesapeake, Ohio & South Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Bell v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API