Holbrook v. Holbrook
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
By her second assignment of error, defendant-wife challenges the court’s finding of fact that plaintiff-husband was a resident of Forsyth County at the time he commenced his divorce and custody action. The findings of the court as to the residence of the parties are conclusive, however, when supported by any competent evidence. Doss v. Nowell, 268 N.C. 289, 150 S.E. 2d 394 (1966); Howard v. Queen City Coach Co., 212 N.C. 201, 193 S.E. 138 (1937); Clarke v. Clarke, 15 N.C. App. 576, 190 S.E. 2d 390 (1972). The findings made by the judge in this instance with respect to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hopkins v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Howard v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Kennedy v. SurrattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Doss v. NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Clarke v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Benson v. BensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978