Legal Opinion

Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1926No. 732-4324PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

NICKELS, J.

The defendants in error (who were defendants in the trial court), in their answer, thus describe the basic transaction now before the Supreme Court:

“These defendants further allege: That the plaintiffs made application for the loan of the money, and that the execution of all of the notes and of the deeds of trust were parts of the same transaction, and all were executed at the same time, said transaction being a contract between said plaintiff and the defendant Commerce Farm Credit Company, by which the said Commerce Farm Credit Company agreed to loan the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parks, Administrator v. LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Bank of Newport v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. Liles v. Bank of Camden CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Patterson v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Marsh v. TillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Abilene Christian College v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Yonack v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Bothwell v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank & Trust Co. of RuskCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API