Legal Opinion

Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1924No. 2369. [fn*]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants brought this suit to cancel a certain contract evidencing a loan of money on allegation that it was usurious, and also to recover double the amount of money paid as interest on the loan. A trial without a jury resulted in judgment for the defendants.

The facts pleaded and proven are substantially as follows: The plaintiffs borrowed the sum of $4,200 from one of the defendants, the Commerce Farm Credit Company, and executed their note to the said company for the sum of $4,200, payable 10 years after date. It had been agreed that the loan should bear interest at the rate of 9 per…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bank of the United States v. Waggener and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Dugan v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Parks, Administrator v. LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Commerce Farm Credit Co. v. RampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Low v. Sutherlin, Barry & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API