Legal Opinion

Yonack v. Emery

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1928No. 10258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

C. A. Emery, plaintiff be'low, alleged substantially that Julius and Jacob Yonack owned a note originally given by plaintiff to W. C. Gill for the principal sum of $2,000, bearing 8 per cent, interest per an-num, payable $50 per month with interest on the unpaid balance, secured by a deed of trust on a lot of land situated in the city of ' Dallas, in which William T. Sargeant is named as trustee; that this transaction is usurious and void, in that the actual principal of the note was only $1,460, the sum of $540 added, to make the note $2,000, was without consideration; that the monthly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wootton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. International Building & Loan Ass'n v. BieringTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Gilder v. HearneTexas Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. Howard Broadcasting CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Dallas Development Co. v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Fort v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Jeter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. in the Estate of Maurice Boylan, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API