Legal Opinion
Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1984No. 83-5884PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Loehr sought injunctive relief and damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the California Constitution for alleged deprivations-of liberty and property. The district court granted summary judgment against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
In 1974 the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Ventura County Community College District (District) hired Loehr as superintendent of the District. In 1979, after rating his performance “outstanding,” the Board offered him a four-year contract to continue as superintendent. Loehr accepted.
Later that year, two new…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- San Bernardino Physicians' Services Medical Group, Inc. v. County of San Bernardino, Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino, Francis L. ComunaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Senza-Gel Corporation, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. John B. Seiffhart, Goehring Meat, Inc., and Ohi, Inc., Appellees/crossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.