Legal Opinion

State v. Nagel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1947No. File Cr. 204PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendant, Earl Nagel, was convicted in the District Court of Burleigh County of the crime of rape in the third degree. The information on which he wa.s tried charged that the defendant did commit the crime of rape in the second degree in the manner following towit: “That at the said time and place the said defendant did then and there wil-fully and unlawfully and feloniously have an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a female (naming the complaining witness) not the wife of said defendant, under the following conditions: that said female did then and there resist, but her…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. People v. AlexNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. HillingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. DiscoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. NewnamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API