Legal Opinion
State v. Platt
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1992No. 13510PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of fraud by worthless check. On appeal he argues that: (1) the check in question was given for a pre-existing debt, which, as a matter of law, did not violate the Worthless Check Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 30-36-1 to -10 (Repl.Pamp.1989); (2) the evidence that the victim had reason to believe that defendant did not have sufficient funds to cover the check was uncontroverted; (3) the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion in limine to bar any reference to the fact that North Academy Interiors was not a licensed contractor; and (4)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CarrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. McKayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Parker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BarelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PalmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. PandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. LozanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. CruzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.