Legal Opinion
State v. McKay
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1969No. 245PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of four separate offenses. His sentences for these offenses are running concurrently.
His first point is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on a charge of fraud. He contends that the State failed to prove fraud ás required by § 40A-16-6, N.M.S.A. 1953, under which he was charged and convicted. This statute provides in part:
“Fraud consists of the intentional misappropriation or taking of anything of value which belongs to another by means of fraudulent conduct, practices or representations.”
In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Perry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hughes v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BloomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. RobinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ThoreenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.