Legal Opinion

State v. Carr

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1981No. 4376PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of forty-two counts under the Controlled Substances Act, §§ 30-31-1 to 30-31-40, N.M.S.A.1978 (1980 Repl.Pamph.). He was found by the jury to be guilty of trafficking in dilaudid, contrary to § 30-31-20, of distributing biphetamine, contrary to § 30-31-22, and of intentionally acquiring or obtaining possession of dilaudid and biphetamine by misrepresentation, fraud, deception, or subterfuge, contrary to §§ 30-31-20 and 30-31-25 of the C.S.A. and § 30-28-2, N.M.S.A.1978 (1980 Cum.Supp.). We affirm.

The issues we address are: I. Whether a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jim R. Hunter v. State of New Mexico Attorney General of the State of New Mexico Robert J. Tansey, Warden, New Mexico State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. OlguinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API