Legal Opinion
Frank v. Xerox Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 30, 2003No. Nos. 02-20416, 02-20516PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, District Judge:
This appeal, which presents several issues, arises out of Appellants’ fretful employment relationships with Xerox Corporation. The Appellants in these related cases filed several lawsuits against Xerox under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981(2003), alleging that because they are black Xerox denied them promotions and pay increases and forced them to work in a racially hostile work environment. Xerox moved for summary judgment as to each Plaintiff. The district court granted those motions and denied Plaintiffs’ motions for reconsideration. They appeal the district court’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Byers v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Pegram v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Abarca v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Stover v. Hattiesburg Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Humphries v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Kymberli Gardner v. CLC of Pascagoula, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.