Legal Opinion

C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 9, 1990No. 87-CV-3874PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge.

The plaintiff obtained an order of this court directing the defendant HUD to show cause why it should not be directed to (1) pay to the plaintiff the sum of $618,015.88 in full satisfaction of a supplemental judgment against HUD entered on June 6, 1990; (2) pay the costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in seeking the relief.

The background of this case leading up to this application is fully set out in a Memorandum and Order issued by this Court on January 12, 1990; the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated May 8,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Waite.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. National Service Industries, Inc. v. Vafla Corporation, Samuel L. Lionberger, Jr., Terrence D. Henderson, William C. Roberts, and Charles D. Fox, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Schell v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dicola v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. in Re State Board for Educator CertificationTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re Westwood Plaza Apartments, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 1993
  4. Ammcon, Inc. v. KempDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  5. In Re Capital West InvestorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API