Legal Opinion
International Air Response v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 12, 2007No. 00-428CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
Following the completion of a one-day, two-witness trial, the court entered a summary of the ruling that it would issue as an opinion. This opinion encapsulates that ruling. This decision has long been delayed, in part, because in 2001 the court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for failing to comply with a jurisdictional filing period. On appeal plaintiff proffered a new argument, which the trial court did not have an opportunity to consider. Based on that new argument, in 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fred Fuchs and Roy D. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Old Stone Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- International Air Response Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- International Air Response, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.