Legal Opinion

International Air Response, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 15, 2008No. 00-428CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.

The Application for Attorneys’ Fees of International Air Response, Inc. (“plaintiff’), is before the court after trial and entry of judgment in plaintiffs favor. Plaintiff asserts that it is a prevailing party in a civil action brought against the United States and entitled to attorneys’ fees, costs, and other expenses incurred during the course of the civil action. Plaintiff argues that the position of the Government, through the United States Forest Service (the “Forest Service”) and the Department of Justice, both before suit was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Air Response Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API