Legal Opinion

International Air Response Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 2, 2008No. 00-428CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to RCFC 59(a)(1) was filed on March 18, 2008, seeking reconsideration of an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to plaintiff. See Int’l Air Response, Inc. v. United States, 80 Fed.Cl. 460 (2008) (order granting application under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2000) (the “EAJA”)) (the “EAJA Opinion”); see also Int’l Air Response, Inc. v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. 604 (2007) (the “Merits Opinion”). Pursuant to the order entered on March 18, 2008, plaintiff filed its response on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API