Legal Opinion

Patton v. Patton

Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided June 8, 2016No. 14PO02337; A158149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOOKEY, J.,

Respondent appeals an order continuing a restraining order entered against him under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA). ORS 107.700 - 107.735. Respondent contends that petitioner failed to present any evidence to prove that petitioner had suffered abuse, was in imminent danger of further abuse, or that respondent presented a credible threat to petitioner’s safety to support the continuation of the restraining order. See ORS 107.718(1). We reverse.

Pursuant to ORAP 5.40(8)(a), respondent requested that we exercise our discretion to review this matter de novo. Because this is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lefebvre v. LefebvreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Fielder v. FielderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Hubbell v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Valenti v. AckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Poulalion v. LempeaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vanik-Burns v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Drake v. AlonsoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Daley v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Kelley v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API