Legal Opinion

Poulalion v. Lempea

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 15, 2012No. 115014; A147965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Respondent appeals an order continuing a restraining order that petitioner obtained against him under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), ORS 107.700 to 107.735. Respondent contends that petitioner failed to present sufficient evidence to support continuation of the order. Petitioner did not file a brief or appear on appeal. We agree with respondent and therefore reverse.

The notice of appeal in this matter was filed after June 4,2009; consequently, and in the absence of any request pursuant to ORAP 5.40(8)(a) that we exercise our discretion to review this matter de novo, we decline to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Hannemann v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Holbert v. NoonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valenti v. AckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Patton v. PattonMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Daley v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Kelley v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API